MedicineEurope PMC

Heuristic editor, no API keyVerdict: Major

Clopidogrel monotherapy versus aspirin monotherapy in females and males after percutaneous coronary intervention: a sex-stratified analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 trial

Original title: Clopidogrel monotherapy versus aspirin monotherapy in females and males after percutaneous coronary intervention: a sex-stratified analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 trial.

Background Clopidogrel has emerged as a promising alternative to aspirin monotherapy for maintenance therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, the optimal antiplatelet strategy according to sex…

By Kwon, Choi, Park +34EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

Score█████░░░░░5.2

Key numbers

  • 6.7% vs 5.2%
  • 95% confidence interval
  • 4.3% vs 9.4%

VerdictA leading story on any desk.

Read the original

Abstract

Background Clopidogrel has emerged as a promising alternative to aspirin monotherapy for maintenance therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, the optimal antiplatelet strategy according to sex remains controversial. Aims We aimed to investigate whether the treatment effect of antiplatelet therapy differs according to sex. Methods This study was a prespecified substudy of the SMART-CHOICE 3 trial. Patients at high risk of recurrent ischaemic events who had completed the standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results A total of 5,506 patients, including 1,002 females and 4,504 males, were enrolled in South Korea. Females had a higher risk profile than males; however, the incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between females and males (6.7% vs 5.2%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-1.28; p=0.537). Clopidogrel, compared with aspirin, significantly reduced the primary endpoint in females (4.3% vs 9.4%, adjusted HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.85; p=0.014) but not in males (4.4% vs 6.0%, adjusted HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.56-1.07; p=0.116). There was no significant interaction between sex and the antiplatelet therapy (p for interaction=0.288). Conclusions In patients with remote PCI and a high risk of recurrent ischaemic events, clopidogrel monotherapy showed a directionally consistent reduction in the composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with aspirin in both females and males. No significant sex-by-treatment interaction was observed, supporting the consistency of the treatment effect across sexes.

Woochan Kwon, Ki Hong Choi, Yong Hwan Park, Jin-Ok Jeong, Chan Joon Kim, Kyeong Ho Yun, Han Cheol Lee, Kiyuk Chang, Mahn-Won Park, Jang-Whan Bae, Joon-Hyung Doh, Byung Ryul Cho, Hee-Yeol Kim, Weon Kim, Ung Kim, Seung-Woon Rha, Young Joon Hong, Hyun-Jong Lee, Sung Gyun Ahn, Doo-Il Kim, Jang Hyun Cho, Sung Ho Her, Doo Soo Jeon, Seung Hwan Han, Jin-Bae Lee, Cheol Whan Lee, Danbee Kang, Joo Myung Lee, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, et al.

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

DimensionLevelWeightWhat that level means
Leverage██░░░ 210%Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt).
Magnitude████░ 420%A qualitative jump: a capability or regime that did not exist before.
Evidence█████ 532%Definitive: phase 3 randomized evidence on hard endpoints, multi-lab replication, or community verification at scale.
Novelty█░░░░ 18%A minor twist on a known approach.
Trajectory██░░░ 25%Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
Stakes███░░ 325%Meaningful benefit to many people within a few years.

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: gains (relative gain, versus baseline, efficacy); design (randomized); verification (confidence interval, p-value); stakes (mortality, major disease, prevention or cure). Red flags: derivative (comparative study).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-09-29

Score█████░░░░░5.2

Score = 10 × (80% × adjusted merit / 10 + 10% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Merit
7.1 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
5.5 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (48%).
Attention
35%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
52%
Half-life decay since publication.
  • Citations1 (reference 20, via openalex, Sep 29, 2026, 23:53 UTC)
  • Field-weighted citation impact5.0 (reference 3, via openalex, Sep 29, 2026, 23:53 UTC)

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v2 on Sep 29, 2026, 23:53 UTC. Paper type: clinical.
  • Categories: Comparative Study, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal Article, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Aspirin, Ticlopidine, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Treatment Outcome
  • TOP, No.2 in the Medicine edition of September 30, 2026.
  • TOP, No.2 in the Medicine edition of September 29, 2026.