ClimatearXiv
Heuristic editor, no API keyVerdict: RoutineAutoCF: An Automated LLM-Assisted Ecosystem for Compound Flood Simulation, Evaluation, and Impact Attribution
Compound coastal flooding (CCF) arises from interacting coastal, precipitation, and river processes, yet modeling workflows often separate simulation, evaluation, and impact analysis.
Key numbers
- 98.8% of cells
VerdictCompetent work. Briefs at most.
Abstract
Compound coastal flooding (CCF) arises from interacting coastal, precipitation, and river processes, yet modeling workflows often separate simulation, evaluation, and impact analysis. We present AutoCF, an automated ecosystem integrating data harmonization, model construction, observational evaluation, exposure analysis, complete factorial driver attribution, and cross-platform execution. The automated Hurricane Harvey simulation achieves a median root mean square error of 0.147 m and correlation of 0.951 across eight observational gauges, and a correlation of 0.942 with 55 high-water marks. Maximum water-level fields from CPU and GPU implementations agree within 0.01 m for 98.8% of cells. Attribution analysis shows that during Harvey, precipitation dominated building and population exposure, whereas coastal forcing becomes increasingly important for deep and persistent inundation. The introduced Driver Impact Shift metric further quantifies whether each driver contributed disproportionately to societal consequences relative to its flooded-area contribution. Overall, AutoCF provides a reproducible pathway from CCF model construction to evaluation and driver-specific impact interpretation.
The editor's rubric
| Dimension | Level | Weight | What that level means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leverage | ███░░ 3 | 16% | A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year. |
| Magnitude | ██░░░ 2 | 20% | Solid incremental gain on a meaningful problem. |
| Evidence | ███░░ 3 | 20% | Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data. |
| Novelty | ██░░░ 2 | 10% | A new combination of known ideas. |
| Trajectory | ██░░░ 2 | 14% | Some room to improve with obvious engineering. |
| Stakes | ███░░ 3 | 20% | Meaningful benefit to many people within a few years. |
Editor’s rationale
Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose); breadth (programmable); verification (independent replication); stakes (global scale, climate).
How the score was computed
- Merit
- 5.1 / 10
- Adjusted merit
- 4.5 / 10
- Attention
- 0%
- Freshness
- 89%
- Citations0 (reference 15, via semantic-scholar, Sep 29, 2026, 23:37 UTC)