PhysicsarXiv

Heuristic editor, no API keyVerdict: Notable

Observing the magic Mpemba effect in localized dynamics on a digital quantum computer

The Mpemba effect challenges the intuition that states closer to equilibrium must relax faster.

By Li, Yan, Zhang +3

Score████░░░░░░4.4

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

The Mpemba effect challenges the intuition that states closer to equilibrium must relax faster. We ask whether an analogous magic-ordering reversal can occur in the generation of quantum magic (nonstabilizerness), a key resource for universal quantum computation: can a state with less initial magic overtake one with more and reach its asymptotic value sooner? Here, we uncover interaction-induced dephasing as a distinct mechanism for this magic Mpemba effect, requiring neither transport nor conventional thermalization. For tilted product states in an interacting ℓ-bit model, a random-phase analysis predicts a reversal of the magic ordering: states with less initial magic attain higher saturated magic, independent of their spatial pattern. Exact simulations of the ℓ-bit model and localized spin chains further show that these states also saturate earlier. We observe both features on IBM superconducting quantum processors. An effective ℓ-bit implementation accesses long dephasing times at fixed circuit depth by encoding time in gate angles, while a microscopic spin model exhibits the reversal universally across initial patterns in the localized regime but only selectively in the ergodic regime. These results establish interaction-induced dephasing as a route to anomalous quantum-resource relaxation beyond transport-driven thermalizing dynamics.

Han-Ze Li, Xianquan Yan, Yi-Rui Zhang, Jian-Xin Zhong, Shuo Liu, Ching Hua Lee

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

DimensionLevelWeightWhat that level means
Leverage███░░ 318%A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year.
Magnitude██░░░ 220%Solid incremental gain on a meaningful problem.
Evidence███░░ 322%Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
Novelty███░░ 322%A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
Trajectory███░░ 310%A clear path to scale.
Stakes██░░░ 28%Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: breadth (general-purpose); novelty (contrary to expectation, discovery); verification (independent replication); scale (efficient).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-09-29

Score████░░░░░░4.4

Score = 10 × (75% × adjusted merit / 10 + 15% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Merit
5.4 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.6 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (40%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
95%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v2 on Oct 7, 2026, 07:29 UTC. Paper type: empirical.
  • Categories: quant-ph, cond-mat.dis-nn
  • BRIEF, No.4 in the Physics edition of October 7, 2026.