PhysicsarXiv

Heuristic editor, no API keyVerdict: Notable

Fully charmed tetraquarks on the Lattice with controlled errors

We introduce the lattice quark potential model (LQPM), which discretizes the nonrelativistic quark potential model on a periodic cubic lattice and diagonalizes the resulting many-body Hamiltonian exactly.

By Zhang, Lu, Wang +1

Score████░░░░░░4.3

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

We introduce the lattice quark potential model (LQPM), which discretizes the nonrelativistic quark potential model on a periodic cubic lattice and diagonalizes the resulting many-body Hamiltonian exactly. Unlike variational approaches, which provide only upper bounds on the energy, LQPM removes this variational bias, and its remaining finite-volume uncertainty is removed by extrapolation. Formulated directly in coordinate space, the method is indifferent to the specific form of the potential and accommodates arbitrary interactions, such as including three-body forces and spin-orbit and tensor couplings, that are difficult to treat in conventional few-body approaches. As a benchmark, the charmonium and Ω_ccc spectra are reproduced within a few MeV of experiment. For the fully charmed tetraquark cccc, we obtain a J^P=0⁺ ground state at 5934.8(13)~MeV, 33.2(13)~MeV below the η_cη_c threshold, unambiguously identified as a deeply bound tetraquark whose existence is robust against the choice of potential. Such a state can decay into two dileption pairs 2(e⁺e⁻) via J/ψe⁺e⁻, with significance similar to X(6400), or about one order of magnitude smaller. Lying below the lowest strong-decay channel, it can decay only through electromagnetic and weak interactions. Our results establish exact lattice diagonalization as a controlled, systematically improvable, and broadly applicable route to multiquark spectroscopy, providing a quantitative benchmark for the strong interaction and valuable guidance for future experimental searches for exotic hadrons.

Zhenyu Zhang, Bing-Nan Lu, Qian Wang, Qiang Zhao

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

DimensionLevelWeightWhat that level means
Leverage███░░ 318%A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year.
Magnitude███░░ 320%Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
Evidence███░░ 322%Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
Novelty██░░░ 222%A new combination of known ideas.
Trajectory███░░ 310%A clear path to scale.
Stakes██░░░ 28%Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose); breadth (programmable); gains (orders of magnitude); verification (error bars, independent replication); scale (orders of magnitude); stakes (energy).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-07

Score████░░░░░░4.3

Score = 10 × (75% × adjusted merit / 10 + 15% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Merit
5.4 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.6 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (44%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
82%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v5 on Oct 8, 2026, 07:29 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: hep-ph, hep-lat
  • BRIEF, No.8 in the Physics edition of October 8, 2026.