PhysicsarXiv

Heuristic editor, no API keyVerdict: Notable

Nonreciprocal black holes with primary hair in beyond Horndeski gravity: Exact solutions and stability

We develop a novel systematic method for constructing exact, static, and asymptotically flat black-hole solutions in shift-symmetric and Z 2 -symmetric beyond Horndeski theories.

By Bahamonde, Nakas, Iteanu

Score████░░░░░░4.3

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

We develop a novel systematic method for constructing exact, static, and asymptotically flat black-hole solutions in shift-symmetric and Z₂-symmetric beyond Horndeski theories. In contrast to previous studies, our approach does not rely on the restrictive reciprocal condition g_ttg_rr=-1, allowing for more general geometries characterized by two independent metric functions. The resulting solution space contains two qualitatively distinct types of hair originating from different branches of the theory. One branch is characterized by khronometric hair, while the other by genuine scalar hair. In both, the scalar profile defines a nontrivial preferred foliation, but the shift-symmetry Noether current and the associated propagating degree of freedom are trivial for the former and nonvanishing for the latter. Focusing mainly on the second branch, we derive several distinct families of exact black-hole solutions. In general, these solutions are singular and exhibit primary scalar hair associated with an independent scalar charge. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that they can be regularized to yield regular black-hole or solitonic configurations, for which the scalar hair becomes secondary. We further investigate the stability properties of these solutions under linear perturbations by analyzing the axial sector and the monopole (ℓ=0) mode of the even-parity sector. For representative solutions with scalar hair, the perturbative analysis provides evidence for linear stability under the modes considered.

Sebastian Bahamonde, Theodoros Nakas, Simon Iteanu

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

DimensionLevelWeightWhat that level means
Leverage███░░ 318%A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year.
Magnitude██░░░ 220%Solid incremental gain on a meaningful problem.
Evidence███░░ 322%Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
Novelty███░░ 322%A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
Trajectory██░░░ 210%Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
Stakes██░░░ 28%Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose, we report, new method); novelty (alternative to status quo); verification (error bars, independent replication).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-07

Score████░░░░░░4.3

Score = 10 × (75% × adjusted merit / 10 + 15% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Merit
5.2 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.5 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (42%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
92%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v5 on Oct 9, 2026, 07:29 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: gr-qc, astro-ph.HE, hep-th
  • BRIEF, No.4 in the Physics edition of October 9, 2026.