MedicinemedRxiv
Heuristic editor, no API keyVerdict: NotableLow-Dose Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment in Aging Patients DATE-AGING Trial: Rationale and Design
Abstract Background: Despite the high stroke burden in the elderly, their thrombolysis utilization is suboptimal partly due to heightened hemorrhagic risk.
Key numbers
- 4.5 hours of ischaemic stroke
- 4.5 hours of symptom onset
- 36 hours and mortality at
Caveats
- Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.
VerdictWorth a reader's time today.
Abstract
Abstract Background: Despite the high stroke burden in the elderly, their thrombolysis utilization is suboptimal partly due to heightened hemorrhagic risk. Observational data suggest that low-dose thrombolysis may offer comparable efficacy to standard-dose with a trend toward reduced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), yet high-level evidence for low-dose thrombolysis in this broad population remains absent. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose intravenous tenecteplase thrombolysis in elderly stroke patients within 4.5 hours of ischaemic stroke onset. Methods and design: The DATE-AGING trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) non-inferiority study. Eligible participants are elderly patients (aged [≥]70 years)with acute ischemic stroke who meet current guideline recommendations for intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of symptom onset will be randomly assigned to Low-dose Tenecteplase group (0.175 mg/kg, max 17.5 mg) or Standard-dose Tenecteplase group (0.25 mg/kg, max 25 mg). The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome, defined as a mRS 0-1 assessed at 90-day post-randomization. Safety outcomes included sICH within 36 hours and mortality at 90 days. Discussions: The DATE-AGING trial is intended to provide high-quality evidence for low-dose tenecteplase intravenous thrombolysis in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke. Trial registry number: NCT07294209(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/07294209). Keywords: elderly patients, acute ischemic stroke, intravenous thrombolysis, low-dose tenecteplase
The editor's rubric
| Dimension | Level | Weight | What that level means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leverage | ██░░░ 2 | 10% | Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt). |
| Magnitude | ██░░░ 2 | 20% | Solid incremental gain on a meaningful problem. |
| Evidence | ████░ 4 | 32% | Strong: large scale, preregistered, independently replicated, or a well-powered randomized trial. |
| Novelty | ██░░░ 2 | 8% | A new combination of known ideas. |
| Trajectory | ██░░░ 2 | 5% | Some room to improve with obvious engineering. |
| Stakes | ███░░ 3 | 25% | Meaningful benefit to many people within a few years. |
Editor’s rationale
Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: novelty (open problem); design (randomized, blinded, registered); stakes (mortality, major disease, prevention or cure).
How the score was computed
- Merit
- 5.8 / 10
- Adjusted merit
- 4.8 / 10
- Attention
- 0%
- Freshness
- 92%
- Citations0 (reference 20, via semantic-scholar, Oct 12, 2026, 06:17 UTC)