MedicineEurope PMC

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Major

Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering by Hematoma Location in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Original title: Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering by Hematoma Location in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Background and objectives Early intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering is now recognized as an effective approach to improve outcome after acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

By Ren, Chen, Hu +13Neurology

Score█████░░░░░4.8

Key numbers

  • 95% CI 0.74-0.89
  • 90 days or 6 months
  • 11,288 patients

VerdictA leading story on any desk.

Read the original

Abstract

Background and objectives Early intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering is now recognized as an effective approach to improve outcome after acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, whether the effect varies by hematoma location is uncertain. We aimed to determine the heterogeneity of the treatment effect of intensive BP lowering on functional outcome by hematoma location. Methods We conducted a pooled analysis of individual patient-level data (IPD) from all 4 Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trials (INTERACT) and the second Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH-II) trial, which were international, randomized, open, blinded end point assessed, controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of early intensive BP control in acute ICH. ICH location was classified as lobar or deep hemisphere or infratentorial. The primary outcome was death or disability (modified Rankin Scale scores 3-6) at 90 days or 6 months (for INTERACT3). The heterogeneity of the treatment effect of intensive BP lowering on the primary outcome by ICH location was estimated using generalized linear mixed models with trial as a random effect and adjustment for prespecified clinical covariates and an interaction term of "treatment-by-location." Results Among 11,288 patients (mean age 62.5 years [SD 12.7]; 4,056 [35.9%] women), 1,141 (10.1%) had lobar ICH, 9,202 (81.5%) had deep ICH and 945 (8.4%) had infratentorial ICH. Compared with deep or infratentorial ICH, lobar ICH occurred in older patients, was less often associated with intraventricular hemorrhage, and had larger hematoma volumes (all p < 0.001). The effect of intensive BP lowering on the primary outcome of death or disability differed by ICH location (p for interaction = 0.033). A clear benefit was only seen in deep ICH (adjusted odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89; p < 0.001). Discussion Hematoma location modifies the treatment effect of intensive BP lowering on functional outcome after ICH, with the benefit observed only in deep ICH. Trial registration information These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (INTERACT1 NCT00226096; INTERACT2 NCT00716079; INTERACT3 NCT03209258; INTERACT4 NCT03790800; and ATACH-II NCT01176565).

Xinwen Ren, Xiaoying Chen, Xin Hu, Yapeng Lin, Chen Chen, Jiguang Wang, Thompson G Robinson, Leibo Liu, Paula Munoz Venturelli, Sheila Co Martins, Octavio M Pontes-Neto, Adnan I Qureshi, Lili Song, Craig Anderson, Xia Wang, as the INTERACT and ATACH-II Investigators

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

DimensionLevelWeightWhat that level means
Leverage██░░░ 210%Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt).
Magnitude███░░ 320%Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
Evidence█████ 532%Definitive: phase 3 randomized evidence on hard endpoints, multi-lab replication, or community verification at scale.
Novelty██░░░ 28%A new combination of known ideas.
Trajectory██░░░ 25%Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
Stakes███░░ 325%Meaningful benefit to many people within a few years.

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: gains (efficacy); novelty (open problem); design (randomized, blinded, registered); verification (confidence interval, p-value); scale (scalable); stakes (mortality, prevention or cure).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-07

Score█████░░░░░4.8

Score = 10 × (80% × adjusted merit / 10 + 10% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Merit
6.8 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
5.4 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (50%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
53%
Half-life decay since publication.
  • Citations0 (reference 20, via openalex, Oct 17, 2026, 06:17 UTC)

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v6 on Oct 17, 2026, 06:17 UTC. Paper type: clinical.
  • Categories: Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal Article, Humans, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Acute Disease, Hematoma, Antihypertensive Agents, Treatment Outcome, Blood Pressure, Aged
  • TOP, No.4 in the Medicine edition of October 17, 2026.