AIarXiv

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Notable

Rethinking Underwater Image Enhancement: Learning through Text-Guided Degradation Curriculum

Existing paired clean-degraded datasets have advanced learning-based underwater image enhancement, but they remain either limited in scale or difficult to acquire, and still fail to adequately cover the diverse…

By Tian, Li, Ye +6

Score████░░░░░░4.0

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

Existing paired clean-degraded datasets have advanced learning-based underwater image enhancement, but they remain either limited in scale or difficult to acquire, and still fail to adequately cover the diverse degradations encountered in real-world underwater environments. Such scarce and insufficient data ultimately restrict the generalization of underwater image enhancement models, highlighting the need for realistic and controllable degradation modeling to better capture real underwater conditions and improve enhancement robustness. To this end, we propose a unified degradation-aware training framework for the underwater image enhancement task. A Text-Conditioned Degradation Augmentation Pipeline uses a text-guided diffusion model to synthesize diverse and semantically consistent degraded samples, providing paired data to support the subsequent curriculum learning strategy. The proposed Progressive Degradation Curriculum organizes training across multiple attributes and difficulty levels to promote balanced learning, and a Transmission-Guided One-Step Diffusion Model leverages this progressive process to better address the wide range of degradation severity and restoration ambiguity in underwater images. Extensive experiments on multiple underwater benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed method achieves superior performance. Our code and models will be released upon the publication of this work.

Hongri Tian, Wenxue Li, Tian Ye, Sixiang Chen, Lujia Wang, Xianying Wang, Xinhu Zheng, Gang Hua, Lei Zhu

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage4 / 5
A general-purpose tool used across several fields (Adam, ResNet, LoRA, next-generation sequencing).
24% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude3 / 5
Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
18% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence3 / 5
Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
14% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty2 / 5
A new combination of known ideas.
16% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory3 / 5
A clear path to scale.
18% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes2 / 5
Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
10% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose); breadth (wide range, many tasks); gains (outperforms); verification (multiple benchmarks, code released); scale (scalable).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score████░░░░░░4.0

Score = 10 × (65% × adjusted merit / 10 + 25% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
6.0 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.8 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (42%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
84%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v7 on Oct 22, 2026, 01:55 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: cs.CV
  • BRIEF, No.9 in the Artificial Intelligence edition of October 22, 2026.