ClimateOpenAlex
Ranked by formulaVerdict: NotableTwo components underlie the mixed-type El Niño: quantification and future projection
Frequent strong El Niño events, including the extremes of 2015/16 and 2023/24, have exerted profound global climatic impacts.
Key numbers
- 6.4% in moderate events to
VerdictWorth a reader's time today.
Abstract
Frequent strong El Niño events, including the extremes of 2015/16 and 2023/24, have exerted profound global climatic impacts. Unlike canonical Eastern Pacific (EP) and Central Pacific (CP) types, defined by the location of maximum sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies, these events exhibit a distinct mixed-type pattern characterized by warming in both regions. However, the respective contributions of the EP and CP patterns to the mixed-type events remain poorly understood. Here, using a binary linear regression based on E- and C-indices associated with the EP and CP patterns, we quantify the contribution of the E- and C-components, and show that strong El Niño events are mostly of the mixed-type. Our results indicate that the C-component is the primary source of ENSO variability, while during strong El Niño events, the average contribution of the E-component increases significantly from 6.4% in moderate events to 46.8%, thereby forming the mixed-type El Niño events. Analyses of 45 models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) project that, in a warming climate, the frequency of the strong mixed-type events increases by 33.5%. We emphasize that the mixed-type El Niño is the primary contributor to strong El Niño events, with a proportion far exceeding that of either the EP or CP type. Our method offers a framework for understanding ENSO diversity and its response to climate change.
The editor's rubric
- Leverage2 / 5
- Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt).
- Magnitude3 / 5
- Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
- Evidence3 / 5
- Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
- Novelty2 / 5
- A new combination of known ideas.
- Trajectory2 / 5
- Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
- Stakes3 / 5
- Meaningful benefit to many people within a few years.
Editor’s rationale
Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: gains (relative gain, outperforms); verification (multiple benchmarks); stakes (global scale, climate).
How the score was computed
Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.
- Merit
- 5.2 / 10
- Adjusted merit
- 4.5 / 10
- Attention
- 0%
- Freshness
- 91%
- Citations0 (reference 15, via openalex, Oct 23, 2026, 07:03 UTC)