PhysicsarXiv

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Notable

In situ performance of the Vertex Silicon Plane in the BM@N experiment during Run 9

The Vertex Silicon Plane (VSP) was commissioned and operated for the first time as the most upstream tracking station of the Baryonic Matter at Nuclotron (BM@N) experiment at the NICA accelerator complex during Run 9.

By Dementev, Shitenkov, Kolozhvari +15

Score████░░░░░░4.3

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

The Vertex Silicon Plane (VSP) was commissioned and operated for the first time as the most upstream tracking station of the Baryonic Matter at Nuclotron (BM@N) experiment at the NICA accelerator complex during Run 9. The station consisting of six double-sided silicon microstrip modules based on the CBM-BM@N detector technology was installed about 8 cm downstream from the target inside the SP-41 analyzing magnet. The in situ module performance was characterized in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio, time resolution, and Lorentz drift in the magnetic field. The most probable cluster signal-to-noise ratio ranges from 15.5 to 33.2, while the time resolution relative to the trigger pulse is about 12 ns. The tracking performance was evaluated using track-hit residuals and hit-matching efficiency; two independent reference configurations based on the Forward Silicon Detector (FSD) and Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) tracking systems give consistent efficiencies of about 95%. The contribution of the VSP to the BM@N tracking performance was further studied through the transverse track impact parameter and the reconstruction of short VSP-GEM tracklets. Owing to its position close to the target and its coverage at large polar angles, the VSP provides an additional near-target tracking point and makes it possible to extend the geometrical acceptance beyond that of the FSD- and GEM-based central tracking system.

D. Dementev, M. Shitenkov, A. Kolozhvari, V. Leontyev, A. Sheremetev, D. Andreev, R. Arteche Diaz, D. Baranov, C. Ceballos Sanchez, I. Gabdrakhmanov, I. Gorelikov, T. Lygdenova, I. Osokin, S. Reyes Peña, I. Rufanov, E. Tsapulina, A. Voronin, Yu. Murin

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage2 / 5
Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt).
18% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude3 / 5
Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence3 / 5
Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
22% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty3 / 5
A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
22% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory2 / 5
Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
10% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes2 / 5
Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
8% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: firsts (for the first time, first); verification (false alarm rate, independent replication); scale (efficient).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score████░░░░░░4.3

Score = 10 × (75% × adjusted merit / 10 + 15% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
5.3 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.5 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (40%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
92%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v7 on Oct 23, 2026, 07:29 UTC. Paper type: empirical.
  • Categories: physics.ins-det, hep-ex
  • BRIEF, No.8 in the Physics edition of October 23, 2026.