MedicineEurope PMC
Ranked by formulaVerdict: MajorTrastuzumab Rezetecan in ERBB2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer: The HORIZON-Breast06 Randomized Clinical Trial
Trastuzumab rezetecan (SHR-A1811) has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in a global phase 1 trial involving heavily pretreated patients with erythroblastic oncogene B (ERBB2)-low metastatic breast…
Key numbers
- 95% CI
- 84.1% of patients
VerdictA leading story on any desk.
Abstract
Importance Trastuzumab rezetecan (SHR-A1811) has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in a global phase 1 trial involving heavily pretreated patients with erythroblastic oncogene B (ERBB2)-low metastatic breast cancer. Objective To compare trastuzumab rezetecan vs physician's choice of chemotherapy in patients with ERBB2-low metastatic breast cancer. Design, setting, and participants This open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 3 trial was conducted at 73 hospitals across China. Eligible patients were females aged 18 to 75 years with centrally confirmed ERBB2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or IHC 2+/in-situ hybridization [ISH]-negative) unresectable locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had received 1 or fewer prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease, with prior endocrine therapy required for hormone receptor-positive disease. Enrollment began on June 30, 2023, and ended on August 20, 2025. The last day of follow-up for the final analysis for progression-free survival in the current study was March 20, 2026. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive trastuzumab rezetecan (6.4 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks; n = 277) or physician's choice of chemotherapy (n = 274). Main outcomes and measures The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in chemotherapy-naive patients and the overall population. Results Between June 30, 2023, and August 20, 2025, a total of 551 patients were randomized, with a mean (SD) age of 54.9 (9.9) years. At the data cutoff (March 20, 2026), trastuzumab rezetecan significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in the chemotherapy-naive patients (median, 16.6 [95% CI, 14.0-19.4] months vs 6.8 [95% CI, 5.7-7.0] months; hazard ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.19-0.33]; P < .001) and the overall population (median, 16.4 [95% CI, 14.0-16.8] months vs 6.8 [95% CI, 5.7-6.9] months; hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.21-0.34]; P < .001). The benefit was consistent in hormone receptor-negative disease (median progression-free survival: 16.5 vs 6.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.34, [95% CI, 0.22-0.54]) and hormone receptor-positive disease (median progression-free survival: 16.4 vs 6.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.18-0.33]). Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events occurred in 84.1% of patients (232/276) with trastuzumab rezetecan and 67.9% (184/271) with chemotherapy, most commonly decreased neutrophil count (180 [65.2%] vs 147 [54.2%]). Conclusions and relevance Trastuzumab rezetecan provided significant progression-free survival benefit over physician's choice of chemotherapy in patients with ERBB2-low advanced breast cancer, with benefit observed across all key subgroups. It exhibited the potential as a new treatment option with a distinct safety profile in this setting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05814354.
The editor's rubric
- Leverage2 / 5
- Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt).
- Magnitude4 / 5
- A qualitative jump: a capability or regime that did not exist before.
- Evidence5 / 5
- Definitive: phase 3 randomized evidence on hard endpoints, multi-lab replication, or community verification at scale.
- Novelty3 / 5
- A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
- Trajectory2 / 5
- Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
- Stakes4 / 5
- Large-scale human impact: millions of people, or a major industry.
Editor’s rationale
Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: gains (versus baseline, efficacy); novelty (open problem); design (randomized, blinded, phase 3); verification (confidence interval, p-value, independent replication); stakes (global scale, mortality, major disease).
How the score was computed
Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.
- Merit
- 7.9 / 10
- Adjusted merit
- 5.9 / 10
- Attention
- 0%
- Freshness
- 80%
- Citations0 (reference 20, via openalex, Oct 26, 2026, 06:17 UTC)