PhysicsarXiv
Ranked by formulaVerdict: NotableZero photoemission from icosahedral superatoms
Photoemission is expected to occur when the photon energy exceeds the binding energy of an electron, with the photoemission yield generally remaining non-zero above this threshold.
Caveats
- Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.
VerdictWorth a reader's time today.
Abstract
Photoemission is expected to occur when the photon energy exceeds the binding energy of an electron, with the photoemission yield generally remaining non-zero above this threshold. Yet, it can be suppressed at specific photon energies, a phenomenon known as the Cooper minimum. Although complete suppression represents an extreme limit of this phenomenon, such zero photoemission has previously been reported only for atoms with an outermost s-type orbital and has never been observed in non-atomic systems. Here, we demonstrate the deliberate realization of zero photoemission from Ag12W-, an artificial icosahedral superatom, by observing a vanishing photoemission cross section 0.85 eV above the detachment threshold and reproducing this behavior in theoretical simulations. These simulations predict that zero photoemission can be common in nearly spherical nanoclusters, a prediction we experimentally confirm using Ag12Mo-, an isoelectronic counterpart of Ag12W-. Because superatoms offer systematic control over both size and elemental composition using the periodic table, our findings establish a route toward active control of photoemission in finite-size quantum systems and stimulate further investigations of underexplored physical phenomena such as nondipole effects.
The editor's rubric
- Leverage3 / 5
- A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year.
- Magnitude3 / 5
- Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
- Evidence3 / 5
- Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
- Novelty3 / 5
- A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
- Trajectory2 / 5
- Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
- Stakes2 / 5
- Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
Editor’s rationale
Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we report); gains (outperforms); firsts (new capability); design (placebo-controlled); verification (error bars, experimental validation); stakes (energy).
How the score was computed
Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.
- Merit
- 5.6 / 10
- Adjusted merit
- 4.7 / 10
- Attention
- 0%
- Freshness
- 72%
- Citations0 (reference 20, via semantic-scholar, Oct 26, 2026, 07:29 UTC)