AIarXiv

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Notable

OS-Wizard: Scaling Computer-Using Agents to Specialized Software via Knowledge-Guided Exploration

Computer-using agents are increasingly capable of performing complex tasks in the digital world.

By Liu, Ding, Yang +8

Score████░░░░░░3.6

Key numbers

  • 59.8% and establishing a new

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

Computer-using agents are increasingly capable of performing complex tasks in the digital world. However, high-quality interaction trajectories remain scarce for specialized desktop applications, where limited application knowledge, cumbersome GUI workflows, and incomplete exploration hinder automated collection. We introduce OS-Wizard, an automated trajectory collection framework. It combines tutorial-guided exploration with a hybrid GUI--Code action space, providing application-specific knowledge and simplifying GUI workflows through direct execution of application-native commands. The framework also checkpoints and revisits pivotal states during tree exploration to explore alternative workflows, complementing linear rollouts for broader coverage. We collect 10.9K trajectories comprising 54.9K state--action samples. Fine-tuning open-source base models on this corpus yields a best-performing model that improves performance on a benchmark of specialized desktop workflows by 58.2 percentage points to 64.1%, surpassing reported human performance of 59.8% and establishing a new state of the art. The fine-tuned model also improves performance on general desktop workflows using GUI actions only, suggesting that the collected supervision benefits general desktop tasks as well. Comparative experiments and ablations demonstrate the efficiency of trajectory collection and the importance of code actions.

Zhoumianze Liu, Zichen Ding, Bowen Yang, Zehao Li, Zhenyu Wu, Yibo Zhao, Kanzhi Chen, Yian Wang, Yanan Sun, Qiushi Sun, Yu Qiao

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage3 / 5
A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year.
24% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude3 / 5
Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
18% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence3 / 5
Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
14% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty2 / 5
A new combination of known ideas.
16% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory3 / 5
A clear path to scale.
18% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes2 / 5
Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
10% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose); gains (state of the art, outperforms); novelty (new kind); design (phase 3); verification (ablations, code released); scale (scalable, efficient); stakes (general AI). Red flags: derivative (comparative study).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score████░░░░░░3.6

Score = 10 × (65% × adjusted merit / 10 + 25% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
5.5 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.7 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (48%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
54%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v10 on Oct 27, 2026, 01:36 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: cs.AI
  • BRIEF, No.8 in the Artificial Intelligence edition of October 27, 2026.