PhysicsarXiv

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Notable

Autonomous atomistic-continuum coupling through uncertainty-aware active learning

We develop an uncertainty-aware surrogate modeling approach for coupling an atomistic kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) surface-chemistry solver with a continuum multi-species fluid dynamics solver across disparate physical…

By Abdulah, Sitaraman, Larsen +5

Score████░░░░░░4.2

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

We develop an uncertainty-aware surrogate modeling approach for coupling an atomistic kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) surface-chemistry solver with a continuum multi-species fluid dynamics solver across disparate physical length and time scales. The surrogate model predicts boundary mass fluxes for six species and their uncertainties, which the continuum solver monitors to automatically trigger additional KMC simulations when new training data are needed. This enables efficient multiscale coupling and maintains a user-specified level of accuracy. We demonstrate the approach for reactive halide-perovskite vapor deposition, which involves a multi-species vapor jet impinging on a reactive substrate. The KMC solver uses a DFT-calibrated energetics model that we construct as part of this work and provides net deposition and desorption rates for six species. With a conservative uncertainty threshold, the surrogate-coupled approach reproduces cumulative mass fluxes of the directly coupled approach with errors typically within 10-20%, while capturing the non-monotonic dependence of net deposition on species partial pressure. Importantly, the results show that detailed crystal structure need not be explicitly represented to predict quantities exchanged between atomistic and continuum solvers; species-resolved mass fluxes provide a sufficiently low-dimensional representation of the atomistic response. For this accuracy target, the autonomous online-learning approach reduces the number of required atomistic simulations by two to three orders of magnitude relative to direct multiscale coupling.

Daniel Abdulah, Hariswaran Sitaraman, Ross E. Larsen, Kevin Patrick Griffin, Grace Wei, Janelle Domantay, Ethan Young, Marc T. Henry de Frahan

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage3 / 5
A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year.
18% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude3 / 5
Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence3 / 5
Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
22% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty2 / 5
A new combination of known ideas.
22% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory3 / 5
A clear path to scale.
10% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes2 / 5
Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
8% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose, we report); breadth (many tasks); gains (orders of magnitude); verification (error bars, multiple benchmarks, experimental validation); scale (scalable, orders of magnitude, efficient).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score████░░░░░░4.2

Score = 10 × (75% × adjusted merit / 10 + 15% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
5.4 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.7 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (50%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
71%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v10 on Oct 27, 2026, 07:29 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: physics.comp-ph, cond-mat.mtrl-sci, physics.atm-clus
  • TOP, No.6 in the Physics edition of October 27, 2026.