PhysicsarXiv
Ranked by formulaVerdict: NotableDirect observation of a spin-polarized surface Dirac gap in the antiferromagnetic topological insulator NdBi
A gapped Dirac cone in antiferromagnetic topological insulators (AFM-TIs) is essential for realizing the quantized anomalous Hall effect, yet its intrinsic magnitude remains controversial.
VerdictWorth a reader's time today.
Abstract
A gapped Dirac cone in antiferromagnetic topological insulators (AFM-TIs) is essential for realizing the quantized anomalous Hall effect, yet its intrinsic magnitude remains controversial. In the prototypical AFM-TI MnBi2Te4, however, the observed Dirac gap is significantly smaller than theoretical predictions or nearly absent, highlighting a long-standing discrepancy. Here we demonstrate that NdBi hosts a spin-polarized topological surface Dirac cone with a sizable gap of 17 meV at the Dirac point, in excellent agreement with density functional theory predictions (12 meV). This direct observation is enabled by high-resolution 7 eV laser-based spin- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, which unambiguously disentangles the spin-polarized surface Dirac cone from bulk-derived states. Furthermore, through temperature dependence and controlled surface contamination, we establish a direct linkage between surface magnetism and the Dirac gap, demonstrating that the gap opens only in the presence of surface magnetic order. These results provide definitive spectroscopic evidence for an intrinsic Dirac gap in AFM-TIs and establish NdBi as a model platform to resolve the long-standing discrepancy between experiment and theory in AFM-TIs.
The editor's rubric
- Leverage3 / 5
- A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year.
- Magnitude2 / 5
- Solid incremental gain on a meaningful problem.
- Evidence3 / 5
- Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
- Novelty3 / 5
- A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
- Trajectory2 / 5
- Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
- Stakes2 / 5
- Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
Editor’s rationale
Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we report); breadth (programmable); novelty (open problem, discovery).
How the score was computed
Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.
- Merit
- 5.2 / 10
- Adjusted merit
- 4.5 / 10
- Attention
- 0%
- Freshness
- 93%
- Citations0 (reference 20, via openalex, Oct 27, 2026, 07:29 UTC)