BiologyarXiv

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Notable

MtReNIRS: A Self-Supervised Foundation Model for Transferable Neurovascular Representations

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers a promising approach for monitoring the hemodynamic correlates of neural activity in naturalistic settings.

By Chae, Avramidis, Emmanouilidou +1

Score█████░░░░░4.5

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers a promising approach for monitoring the hemodynamic correlates of neural activity in naturalistic settings. However, existing modeling methods for fNIRS are largely confined to small-scale, single-session data with low sampling rates, driven by high heterogeneity in acquisition devices and optode montages. In addition, the complex spatiotemporal structure of fNIRS signals further restricts model scalability and transferability across settings. As a result, it remains unclear whether a single fNIRS encoder can learn representations that are usable across subjects, tasks, devices, and montages. Here, we show that a montage-aware masked autoencoder, pretrained on 12 public fNIRS datasets spanning 268 subjects and 567 recording hours, learns generalizable neurovascular representations that transfer across three external datasets. Our fNIRS foundation model, MtReNIRS, jointly encodes the slow hemodynamic nature of fNIRS, chromophore identity and cortical location by mapping heterogeneous montages onto a shared anatomical reference. MtReNIRS achieves cross-subject performance on par or better than fully supervised baselines and excels in few-shot within-subject calibration, where it outperforms prior state-of-the-art fNIRS models, while remaining robust to sparse montages. Our results indicate that montage-aware self-supervision yields physiologically grounded, transferable fNIRS representations, providing a scalable foundation for label-efficient brain-computer interfaces.

Tony Chae, Kleanthis Avramidis, Dimitra Emmanouilidou, Ivan J. Tashev

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage4 / 5
A general-purpose tool used across several fields (Adam, ResNet, LoRA, next-generation sequencing).
24% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude3 / 5
Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
16% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence3 / 5
Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty2 / 5
A new combination of known ideas.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory3 / 5
A clear path to scale.
10% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes2 / 5
Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
10% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we report); breadth (many tasks, zero/few-shot); gains (state of the art, outperforms); verification (multiple benchmarks); scale (scalable, efficient).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score█████░░░░░4.5

Score = 10 × (75% × adjusted merit / 10 + 15% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
5.9 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.9 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (46%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
87%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v10 on Oct 28, 2026, 05:48 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: eess.SP, q-bio.NC
  • TOP, No.2 in the Biology edition of October 28, 2026.