MedicineEurope PMC
Ranked by formulaVerdict: MajorDecitabine plus busulfan-cyclophosphamide versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for reducing risk of relapse in adult KMT2A‑rearranged leukaemia in China: an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial
An unmet need persists for optimal myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adult KMT2A‑rearranged leukaemia.
Key numbers
- 95% CI 6-22
VerdictA leading story on any desk.
Abstract
Background An unmet need persists for optimal myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adult KMT2A‑rearranged leukaemia. We investigated whether decitabine plus busulfan-cyclophosphamide (DAC-BuCy) conditioning reduced the risk of relapse compared with busulfan-cyclophosphamide (BuCy) conditioning. Methods In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at eight transplantation centres in China, eligible patients were aged 14-65 years, had morphologically confirmed KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) before HSCT to DAC-BuCy (intravenous decitabine 20 mg/m2 once a day on days -14 to -10, intravenous busulfan 3·2 mg/kg once a day on days -7 to -4, and intravenous cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg once a day on days -3 to -2) or BuCy (same dose and duration of busulfan and cyclophosphamide). Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) with no stratification and was implemented through an independent, interactive, web-based response system. The primary endpoint was 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03596892) and is complete. Findings Between May 1, 2019, and Jan 31, 2023, 130 patients were randomised to receive a DAC-BuCy (n=65; 34 [52%] female and 31 [48%] male) or BuCy (n=65; 29 [45%] female and 36 [55%] male) regimen. Median follow-up was 34·7 months (IQR 30·2-52·5). 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 12% (95% CI 6-22) in the DAC-BuCy group and 29% (19-41) in the BuCy group (hazard ratio 0·41 [0·20-0·87]; p=0·017). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were infections or infestations (DAC-BuCy group 27 [42%] and BuCy group 25 [38%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (DAC-BuCy group 23 [35%] and BuCy group 22 [34%]), and gastrointestinal disorders (DAC-BuCy group 14 [22%] and BuCy group 15 [23%]). Four (6%) patients in the DAC-BuCy group and five (8%) patients in the BuCy group died from adverse events, of which two were due to regimen-related toxicities: one nervous system disorder in the DAC-BuCy group and one cardiac disorder in the BuCy group. Interpretation The addition of decitabine to BuCy conditioning reduced the risk of relapse with an acceptable safety profile in adult patients with KMT2A‑rearranged leukaemia and could be a suitable therapeutic option for this population. Funding The National Natural Science Foundation of China, the National Key Research and Development Program of China, the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province, the Non-communicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, and the Outstanding Youth Cultivation Program of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. Translation For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
The editor's rubric
- Leverage2 / 5
- Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt).
- Magnitude3 / 5
- Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
- Evidence5 / 5
- Definitive: phase 3 randomized evidence on hard endpoints, multi-lab replication, or community verification at scale.
- Novelty3 / 5
- A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
- Trajectory2 / 5
- Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
- Stakes3 / 5
- Meaningful benefit to many people within a few years.
Editor’s rationale
Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: gains (efficacy); novelty (open problem); design (randomized, phase 3, registered); verification (confidence interval, p-value, independent replication); stakes (major disease, prevention or cure).
How the score was computed
Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.
- Merit
- 7.0 / 10
- Adjusted merit
- 5.5 / 10
- Attention
- 0%
- Freshness
- 98%
- Citations0 (reference 20, via openalex, Nov 1, 2026, 06:17 UTC)