Afforestation reshapes wildfire activity across global temperate biomes

Key numbers

• 26% and burned area by
• 23% in global temperate regions
• 38% increase in Mediterranean Woodlands

In temperate ecosystems, afforestation is rapidly expanding as a flagship climate mitigation strategy. Yet its impact on wildfires remains poorly understood, raising concerns that establishing planted forests over nonforest areas may intensify wildfire activity under increasingly fire-prone climatic conditions. Here, we combine land-use change data, fire activity records, climatic and anthropogenic covariates to quantify how afforestation alters fire occurrence and burned area across 67,248 patches distributed throughout global temperate biomes using satellite records starting in 2001. We found that, on average, afforestation increased fire occurrence by 26% and burned area by 23% in global temperate regions. However, these effects differed markedly among biomes. Wildfire responses ranged from a near-threefold increase in fire occurrence in Temperate Conifer Forests and a 38% increase in Mediterranean Woodlands biomes to an 18% reduction in the Temperate Grasslands, Savannas, and Shrublands biome. In Temperate Broadleaf and Mixed Forests, afforestation reduced fire occurrence but increased burned area, indicating a shift toward less frequent but larger wildfires following the conversion to planted forest. These contrasting, biome-specific responses show that the consequences of afforestation on wildfire activity may depend strongly on ecological and regional context. The strong variability at biome-scale questions the premise that tree planting provides consistent climate mitigation benefits across all landscapes, and highlights the need to evaluate afforestation initiatives alongside regional disturbance regimes. Our findings indicate that wildfire risk should be explicitly accounted for when assessing the long-term effectiveness of afforestation as a climate mitigation strategy in a warming world.

Irene Repeto‐Deudero, Alejandro Miranda, Juli G. Pausas, Carlos Hormazábal, Blas Mola‐Yudego, Javier Lopatin, Susana Gómez‐González

Leverage2 / 5

Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt).

16% of this desk’s rubric

Magnitude3 / 5

Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.

20% of this desk’s rubric

Evidence3 / 5

Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.

20% of this desk’s rubric

Novelty2 / 5

A new combination of known ideas.

10% of this desk’s rubric

Trajectory2 / 5

Some room to improve with obvious engineering.

14% of this desk’s rubric

Stakes3 / 5

Meaningful benefit to many people within a few years.

20% of this desk’s rubric

• Citations0 (reference 15, via openalex, Nov 4, 2026, 07:24 UTC)

• Reviewed by heuristic-v10 on Nov 4, 2026, 07:23 UTC. Paper type: empirical.
• Categories: Fire effects on ecosystems, Forest Management and Policy, Rangeland and Wildlife Management, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Science
• BRIEF, No.7 in the Climate & Energy edition of November 4, 2026.