AIarXiv

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Notable

Open-HumanScale: An Open Recipe for Scaling Human and Robot Experience for Embodied Foundation Models

Egocentric human video offers a scalable source of manipulation priors for robot learning, yet translating raw data scale into generalizable robot policies demands rigorous data curation and training recipes.

By Ma, Li, Tu +28

Score█████░░░░░4.7

Key numbers

  • 92.08% success on RoboTwin 2.0
  • 68.88% on Clean2Random
  • 14.17% mean success rate and

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDFCode

Abstract

Egocentric human video offers a scalable source of manipulation priors for robot learning, yet translating raw data scale into generalizable robot policies demands rigorous data curation and training recipes. We introduce Open-HumanScale, the first fully open recipe for scaling egocentric pretraining to 50,000 hours, anchored by Open-HumanScale-50K---a curated egocentric video corpus densely annotated with hand motion and natural language. Leveraging this corpus, we systematically investigate pure human pretraining via closed-loop simulation evaluations and uncover an empirical log-linear scaling law linking pretraining data hours to downstream robot success rates. Grounded in these findings, we develop HumanWAM-Vanilla, a world--action model pretrained exclusively on 50k hours of egocentric human video. Upon robot post-training, HumanWAM-Vanilla reaches 92.08% success on RoboTwin 2.0 Clean2Clean and 68.88% on Clean2Random, alongside a 14.17% mean success rate and a 19.00 mean progress score on RoboDojo. To push the capability frontier further, we explore joint human--robot pretraining with HumanWAM-Goal, a visual-goal-conditioned world--action model. Hybrid data scaling unlocks broad zero-shot generalization across both simulation and physical benchmarks, propelling post-trained RoboTwin 2.0 performance to new state-of-the-art levels: 92.70% on Clean2Clean and a substantial leap to 84.60% on Clean2Random. On physical robots, HumanWAM-Goal further exhibits emergent embodied in-context learning, dynamically adapting its manipulation behavior to unseen visual goals without parameter updates. To support reproducible scaling research in embodied AI, we open-source the Open-HumanScale-50K corpus, data curation and pretraining pipelines, alongside the pretrained and post-trained HumanWAM checkpoints, inference code, and simulation evaluation suites.

Juncheng Ma, Jiaxin Li, Jiankai Tu, Bo Liang, Guodong Lv, Yufan Deng, Junzhe Tang, Liangzhu Yang, Chen Bian, Zicong Cao, Baohao Zhu, Jianxin Bi, Tengfei Yan, Yinyuan Zhang, Kewei Zhang, Xinglong Chen, Kaiqi Chen, Duomin Wang, Xiaotian Tang, Liang Tan, Li Li, Yuan Xu, Haosen Yang, Yuqi Wang, Jingfei Xia, Songyan Huang, Zhiyang Dou, Zhen Dong, Enze Xie, Tat-Seng Chua, et al.

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage4 / 5
A general-purpose tool used across several fields (Adam, ResNet, LoRA, next-generation sequencing).
24% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude3 / 5
Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
18% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence3 / 5
Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
14% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty3 / 5
A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
16% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory3 / 5
A clear path to scale.
18% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes2 / 5
Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
10% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose); breadth (generalizes, zero/few-shot); gains (state of the art); novelty (new kind); verification (held-out test, independent replication, code released); scale (scalable, improves with scale).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score█████░░░░░4.7

Score = 10 × (65% × adjusted merit / 10 + 25% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
6.3 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
5.1 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (48%).
Attention
30%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
60%
Half-life decay since publication.
  • Hugging Face upvotes10 (reference 25, via hf-daily, Nov 6, 2026, 13:40 UTC)

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v10 on Nov 5, 2026, 13:49 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: cs.CV
  • BRIEF, No.2 in the Artificial Intelligence edition of November 6, 2026.
  • BRIEF, No.3 in the Artificial Intelligence edition of November 5, 2026.