BiologybioRxiv

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Notable

SubcellPert: Benchmarking Subcellular Perturbation Prediction

Perturbations change both RNA abundance and intracellular organization, but gene-count predictors omit the positions needed to model spatial responses.

By Wang, Cao, Dang +5

Score████░░░░░░4.3

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

Perturbations change both RNA abundance and intracellular organization, but gene-count predictors omit the positions needed to model spatial responses. To address this limitation, we introduce SubcellPert, a benchmark for perturbation-response prediction at single-RNA-molecule resolution. It comprises 14 imaging datasets with 13.88 million cells and 3.65 billion RNA molecules. Given source observations and a directed condition change, models generate target RNA populations in normalized two-dimensional coordinates. Two independently trained tasks separate abundance from localization: Oracle predicts coordinates given exact target counts; Joint predicts both. Eight baselines span source resampling, classical transport, and frozen foundation-model adapters. Fixed perturbation and cellular-context holdouts evaluate abundance error, target-gene coverage, and conditional spatial error. Through within-dataset analyses, we find context-dependent gains from spatial features in condition decoding. Interpreting spatial responses requires distinguishing changes within spatial clusters from population composition, and RNA fractions from enrichment relative to compartment geometry. Through comprehensive experiments, we find that Gaussian transport achieves the lowest Oracle spatial error on eight of eleven cellular-context OOD datasets. Audits show that better centroid accuracy can accompany worse radial distributions, and that 19 of 190 Joint adapter fits retain source counts after validation. SubcellPert opens a spatial frontier for virtual cell research, laying the groundwork for predictive models that capture both the molecular composition and intracellular organization of cellular responses. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/king159/SubcellPert}.

J. Wang, H. Cao, X. Dang, T. Zhou, Y. Zhao, C.-Y. Hsieh, C. Gu, P. A. Heng

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage4 / 5
A general-purpose tool used across several fields (Adam, ResNet, LoRA, next-generation sequencing).
24% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude2 / 5
Solid incremental gain on a meaningful problem.
16% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence3 / 5
Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty2 / 5
A new combination of known ideas.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory2 / 5
Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
10% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes2 / 5
Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
10% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose, we report); breadth (many tasks); verification (multiple benchmarks, independent replication, code released); stakes (global scale).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score████░░░░░░4.3

Score = 10 × (75% × adjusted merit / 10 + 15% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
5.4 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.6 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (42%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
88%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v7 on Oct 18, 2026, 05:48 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: bioinformatics
  • TOP, No.5 in the Biology edition of October 18, 2026.