BiologybioRxiv

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Notable

A robust mutation spectrum analysis framework for high-depth error-corrected sequencing data

Comparing mutational spectra across experimental groups requires inference at the level of the biological replicate.

By Williams, Alcaraz, Dodge +4

Score████░░░░░░4.2

Key numbers

  • 100% under the null hypothesis
  • 5% level and had substantially
  • 5% level once the lower-mutation

Caveats

  • Preprint; not yet peer reviewed.

VerdictWorth a reader's time today.

Read the originalPDF

Abstract

Comparing mutational spectra across experimental groups requires inference at the level of the biological replicate. Error-corrected sequencing (ECS) generates hundreds to thousands of mutations per replicate, yet classical pooled G2 tests treat individual mutations as independent observations and ignore replicate-level variability, inflating statistical significance (pseudo-replication). We present a replicate-aware Ridge-Penalized Dirichlet-Multinomial (RP-DMM) framework that models biological replicates directly and accounts for overdispersion. An L2 (ridge) penalty, with strength chosen by leave-one-out cross-validation, stabilizes spectrum estimates by shrinking weakly supported mutation categories toward a common baseline, and inference uses a parametric bootstrap. We also provide a complementary non-parametric rank-permutation test for sparse datasets. In simulations, the pooled G2 test became increasingly anti-conservative as mutation depth increased, with false-positive rates approaching 100% under the null hypothesis. RP-DMM maintained Type I error near the nominal 5% level and had substantially greater power than the rank-permutation test. Regularization was most consequential for high-dimensional spectra. False positive rates approached the nominal 5% level once the lower-mutation group contained approximately 300-500 mutations, depending on the number of biological replicates. A practical target of approximately 400 mutations in the lower-mutation group provided robust Type I error control across all scenarios examined; below this, the rank-permutation test performed robustly and is preferred. In Duplex Sequencing data from benzo[a]pyrene-exposed mice, RP-DMM distinguished exposure-associated mutational signatures from comparisons with higher mutation counts but null effect size, whereas the pooled G2 test declared all comparisons significant. The cross-validated penalty decreased as mutation depth increased, indicating that regularization strength should be tuned to the data. The framework is implemented in the MutSeqR R package.

A. Williams, A. J. Alcaraz, A. Dodge, D. P. LeBlanc, M. J. Meier, C. Yauk, F. Marchetti

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage3 / 5
A method or resource many groups across the field will adopt within a year.
24% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude3 / 5
Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
16% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence3 / 5
Solid: multiple benchmarks or cohorts, ablations, fair baselines, released code or data.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty2 / 5
A new combination of known ideas.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory2 / 5
Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
10% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes2 / 5
Benefits a professional community (practitioners, clinicians, engineers).
10% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: method (we propose); gains (relative gain); verification (experimental validation, independent replication).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score████░░░░░░4.2

Score = 10 × (75% × adjusted merit / 10 + 15% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
5.2 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
4.5 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (38%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
88%
Half-life decay since publication.

No attention signals recorded yet.

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v10 on Oct 25, 2026, 05:48 UTC. Paper type: method.
  • Categories: bioinformatics
  • BRIEF, No.7 in the Biology edition of October 25, 2026.