MedicineEurope PMC

Ranked by formulaVerdict: Major

Ravulizumab in IgA Nephropathy - Interim Analysis of a Phase 3 Trial

In patients with IgA nephropathy, complement activation drives glomerular inflammation, which leads to hematuria, proteinuria, and nephron loss.

By Barratt, Farag, Rice +22The New England journal of medicine

Score█████░░░░░5.3

Key numbers

  • 99% confidence interval
  • 69.5% of the patients receiving
  • 75.8% of those receiving placebo

VerdictA leading story on any desk.

Read the original

Abstract

Background In patients with IgA nephropathy, complement activation drives glomerular inflammation, which leads to hematuria, proteinuria, and nephron loss. Ravulizumab is a terminal complement inhibitor that prevents formation of C5a and C5b-9. Methods In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled adults with IgA nephropathy who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and proteinuria (24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio [with protein and creatinine both measured in grams] of ≥0.75 or total urinary protein excretion of ≥1.0 g per day), despite standard therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive an intravenous infusion of either ravulizumab or placebo every 8 weeks. In the prespecified interim analysis, the primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio at week 34. Safety was also assessed. Results In all, 485 patients underwent randomization, with 240 patients assigned to the ravulizumab group and 245 to the placebo group; 352 patients (176 in each group) were included in the interim analysis. In the ravulizumab group, the geometric mean 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio at baseline and at week 34 was 1.56 and 0.83, respectively; in the placebo group, it was 1.60 and 1.48, respectively. At week 34, a significant reduction in the geometric mean 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio was observed with ravulizumab (-46.6%) as compared with the reduction observed with placebo (-5.6%), corresponding to an adjusted geometric mean 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio that was 43.4% (99% confidence interval, 30.1 to 54.2) lower with ravulizumab than with placebo (P<0.001). Adverse events occurred in 69.5% of the patients receiving ravulizumab and in 75.8% of those receiving placebo; serious adverse events occurred in 4.6% and 9.0%, respectively. No meningococcal infections or deaths occurred. Conclusions In adults with IgA nephropathy, ravulizumab resulted in a significantly greater reduction in the protein-to-creatinine ratio than placebo at week 34. (Funded by Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease Unit; I CAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06291376; EU Clinical Trials number, 2023-507851-31-00.).

Jonathan Barratt, Youssef M K Farag, Kara Rice, Tobin J Cammett, Lesley A Inker, Hernán Trimarchi, Annette Bruchfeld, Hiddo J L Heerspink, Adrian Liew, Kevin Carroll, Hong Zhang, Sayna Norouzi, Shuang Hou, Sehoon Park, Miguel Ángel Pérez Valdivia, Jai Radhakrishnan, Yusuke Suzuki, Bonnie Schneider, John Marsala, Cynthia Carrillo-Infante, Stephen L Lake, Ajay K Singh, Stephen Nolan, Richard A Lafayette, I CAN Trial Group

The editor's rubric

Heuristic review

Leverage2 / 5
Reusable within one subfield (a technique, dataset, or protocol a few groups will adopt).
10% of this desk’s rubric
Magnitude3 / 5
Large gain: roughly 2x, or a clear new state of the art on a hard, unsaturated problem.
20% of this desk’s rubric
Evidence5 / 5
Definitive: phase 3 randomized evidence on hard endpoints, multi-lab replication, or community verification at scale.
32% of this desk’s rubric
Novelty3 / 5
A genuinely new approach to an open problem.
8% of this desk’s rubric
Trajectory2 / 5
Some room to improve with obvious engineering.
5% of this desk’s rubric
Stakes3 / 5
Meaningful benefit to many people within a few years.
25% of this desk’s rubric

Editor’s rationale

Heuristic triage from title and abstract text only, not a reading of the paper. Cues found: gains (relative gain); design (randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3); verification (confidence interval, p-value); stakes (mortality, major disease, prevention or cure).

How the score was computed

rank-2026-10-18

Score█████░░░░░5.3

Score = 10 × (80% × adjusted merit / 10 + 10% × attention + 10% × freshness)

Desks place stronger verdicts first, then use this score to order work within the same verdict.

Merit
7.0 / 10
Weighted rubric, evidence-gated.
Adjusted merit
5.5 / 10
Shrunk toward the desk prior by editor confidence (50%).
Attention
0%
Citations, upvotes, points, mentions.
Freshness
85%
Half-life decay since publication.
  • Citations0 (reference 20, via openalex, Oct 25, 2026, 06:17 UTC)

The record

  • Reviewed by heuristic-v10 on Oct 25, 2026, 06:17 UTC. Paper type: clinical.
  • Categories: Journal Article
  • TOP, No.1 in the Front page edition of October 25, 2026.
  • TOP, No.1 in the Medicine edition of October 25, 2026.